So I recently went down a bit of a rabbit hole after hearing about Danny de Hek. At first, everything I heard painted a very clear picture but the more I looked around, the more mixed things became. Different sources, different tones, different conclusions. It really made me step back and think about how we form opinions online. Sometimes it’s not about choosing a side, but understanding that there might be more going on than we initially see. Curious if anyone else has had a similar experience with this.